Use case · Documents
Share legal documents.
Merger diligence, litigation exhibits, closing binders, NDAs — legal document sharing is either DocuSign's private timeline or a hosted virtual data room. Both leak metadata. Neither produces a cryptographic receipt an outside party can verify.
The change: On-chain notarized documents with field-level, per-recipient sharing.
How it works
Four steps · every step signs a receipt.
Notarize the document on-chain at signing · Dilithium + Solana anchor
Share via distribution matrix · counsel sees whole file, opposing party sees only exhibits, discovery vendor sees only responsive documents
Every access is signed-audit-logged · exportable as court-admissible evidence
Revocation is cryptographic · post-settlement, access to litigation exhibits closes verifiably
Evidence
The proof this actually works.
- Version integrity is on-chain · no post-hoc 'we saw a different version' argument
- Distribution matrix is field-level · you can share 'the covenant not to compete' without sharing 'the compensation table'
- Audit trail is signed and Object-Locked · defensible against spoliation claims
- Edge case: International litigation: cryptographic signatures work across jurisdictions · no local-signature-law fragmentation
- Edge case: Sealed exhibits: revocation is per-recipient and per-field · court seal is enforceable cryptographically
Related capabilities
If you're comparing alternatives
Trust status
Runs today. Honest about what's next.
We publish what's shipped and what's coming — the same list on every page.
Runs today
- Vault workflows running in production
- Cryptographic receipts emitted per action
- Immutable audit trail · Object-Locked
- Auth1 · Wallet · Document · Audit APIs
- Post-quantum primitives (Dilithium + Kyber)
- Benchmark v12 · 2,293,766 auth/sec
Coming next
- Public /verify/
/ receipt viewer - Public /replay/
/ decision viewer - docs.h33.you developer documentation
- SOC 2 Type II Certified
- Payment Requests + Rewards adapters